Details
| Participant | Role | Time Spent | Comments | Latest Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | 43m | 2 | I created the function to do as you asked and call it eac... | |
| Moderator | 0m | |||
| Reviewer - 0% complete | ||||
| Reviewer - 57% complete | 34m | 5 | We have started to use Gerrit for reviews instead of Fish... | |
| Reviewer - 0% complete | ||||
| Reviewer - 0% complete | ||||
| Reviewer - 0% complete | ||||
| Reviewer - 0% complete | ||||
| Reviewer - 0% complete | ||||
| Total | 1h 18m | 7 |
- Files: 11
-
Patches:
- milking_final.patch: (anchored to : / )
- milking_final2.patch: (anchored to swgemu : core3/branches/unstable/ )
- milking_final3.patch: (anchored to swgemu : core3/branches/unstable/ )
- milking_final4.patch: (anchored to swgemu : core3/branches/unstable/ )
Objectives
[Added] The ability to milk creatures
I could not find any good info on the success vs. aggro chances while milking. I therefore came up with a formula that takes the creature's ferocity and the players maskscent/camo skill mods into account.
The way maskscent and conceal are implemented right now, they are both putting the same maskscent buff on the player so it was impossible to distinguish between them when checking the player's buffs. I therefore set the formula up to use both skill mods together. This may be extra generous to rangers right now, but the majority of milkable creatures are low ferocity anyway so regardless of skill, the aggro chance is going to be low. I intend to fix the formula once conceal is fixed to use it's own buff type.
We have started to use Gerrit for reviews instead of Fishey. Please follow the instructions on the following page: https://www.assembla.com/spaces/swgemu/wiki/Git_Gerrit_and_Jenkins and push your patch to Gerrit instead.